Ennis Ford Perfect Drive

House Bill 400 — new life for dead legislation

Barbara Qualls

With only a couple more weeks before the close of the regular session of the Texas Legislature, the pressure to get something of substance accomplished is intense. After almost five months, there is very little to show among the hundreds of bills introduced, parsed, investigated, discussed and debated that will improve the educational life of school kids. Last Thursday was a very important day in the life of the session, though.

That was the deadline date for any bill in the House of Representatives to be heard on second reading.  Without that recognition, a bill is considered dead.

There are still opportunities, though, for so-called “dead bills” to get resuscitated.  That happens when the bill’s author clips the erstwhile dead bill as an amendment on a bill that is still under consideration. There should be a relationship between the original bill and the amendment, but legislators generally are given a great deal of latitude in attaching amendments.

One example:  A bill authored in the House by Scott Hochberg had the intent of allowing a student who transferred into a new school district to skip the usual period of ineligibility for athletic participation if the school he was coming from did not offer the sport the student wished to play.  When that bill made it to the Senate for consideration, Dan Patrick attached an amendment to it that would allow private schools to participate in UIL activities at all classifications.

When the Thursday midnight deadline arrived, some intent watchers were happy to see HB 400 still unheard, thus dead.  HB 400 is the bill authored by Rep. Rob Eissler. Unlike some other large and far-reaching bills, HB 400 hasn’t been given a nickname that sticks. It is the omnibus bill that would give some much-needed flexibility to local school districts in dealing with the expected state budget cuts. The bill would allow districts to lower salaries, use the 22:1 class size ratio as an average, use furlough days to lower expenditures, use their websites for compliance with notification requirements and several other options that would allow districts to spend less.

There was very strong resistance on HB 400 by many groups who fear that the provisions would become permanent and thus remove some of the gains and improvements Texas school employees have achieved over the past several years. The frustrating point, though, is that without the flexibility of HB 400, the only way to deal with the funding shortfall expected in the next biennium will be to cut jobs. For example, EISD’s cost-savings plan would glean $1.5 million, with  $600,000 of that based on the anticipation of using four days of furlough. Without furlough, we still must make up that $600,000 and that will mean whole jobs cut, not just slightly lowered salaries.

The concern that the provisions of HB 400 might become permanent is understandable, and I share that concern. On the other hand, I would welcome any and all options in hunting ways to deal with the shortfall. The “death” of HB 400 takes away many of the options we need.

Eissler promises to use the amendment process to attach HB 400 to every bill he can in an attempt to get some of its measures passed. While bits and pieces of the bill getting passed may be preferred to no flexibility at all, a comprehensive and well-constructed plan would have been a far better outcome.

Barbara Qualls is the superintendent of the Ennis Independent School District.


Post to Twitter




Posted by on May 17 2011. Filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

4 Comments for “House Bill 400 — new life for dead legislation”

  1. I understand your concerns as well….regarding needing tools now to deal with cuts. But had administrators stood together with other education groups and fought for temporary measures that were intended to prevent layoffs, it’s much more likely that a bill giving that flexibility would have come out of the legislature.

    The vast majority of parents and teachers want to keep the current 22:1 law in place, and that they want to actually pay teachers more and protect their rights. Eroding these standards with permanent measures sends the signal that these lawmakers aren’t just interested in preventing layoffs. And indeed, the administrators across the state are jumping on that wagon with them.

  2. defeated

    This is great for a superintendent – where is the bill to cut their exhorbant salaries and perks – cut their salary in half, strip them of their benefits – superintendents and administrators are way overpaid – morale is low in the state of Texas thanks to the GOP

  3. Mike

    Hey Barbara,
    Does the reductions in salaries include yours? And lets be truthful about how districts determine their class ratio. The ratio districts publish claim is not reality.

  4. Frustrated beyond description

    How do we balance the budget? We can either cut programs and jobs or tax more seems to be the only two answers. However, what about focusing on the fraud that evaporates our tax money?

    Teachers don’t make enough as it is, now our leaders are fine with cutting our pay, cutting our sickdays, cutting our insurance reinbursement, cut contributions to our retirement: keep cutting ….the butcher is at the bone now.

    This week I read how the legislature spent one day debating whether or not choking signs should be removed from restaurants. Our legislature is a joke and I hope everyone is voted home in November.

    Also, in the news today is Ft. Worth Super makes over 300,000 a year????
    Why does anyone need to be paid that much? Especially, someone who started teaching for the right reasons……..

Comments are closed

Featured Links

    Search Archive

    Search by Date
    Search by Category
    Search with Google

    Photo Gallery

    Log in


    Copyright: All rights reserved. Users may download and print extracts of content from this website for their own personal and non-commercial use only. Republication or redistribution of Ennis Daily News content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Ennis Daily News. Ennis Daily News and its logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of the Ellis County Newspapers, Inc.

    © Ellis County Newspapers, Inc. 2017